I see a lot of criticism of President Bush with conventional wisdom stories that have been proven to be untrue. Here is an intersting item by John Leo.

http://www.townhall.com/opinion/columns/johnleo/2006/06/11/200735.html

One thing that hasn't been reported much by the media is the translations of Saddam's papers which indicate that Iraq did indeed have WMD up until a few months before the US invaded Iraq. Most of what I have seen reported discounts the accuracy of the papers. Why is that?