The left wing journalists here do not seem impressed by the recent failed terrorists attacks in England and Scotland. They also deride suggestions that AQ is behind the attacks. Of course, in Scotland the terrorists were shouting "Allah," but that was probably just to confuse us. Alan Colmes points out that we have no proof this was conducted by Islamists, so shouldn't anger them by accusing them. They have not said much about it, but authorities in Britain appear to have known attacks were coming, and had issued warnings. That in itself would suggest Islamists were behind it, since those are the guys being watched. But, the Liberal's World view is that the war on terror is a "bumper sticker." They probably would like to blame the attacks on "radical right wing Evangelicals;" maybe those crazy Baptists.
2 Comments:
I don't trust the Methodists or the Pentacostals. They're up to no good. BTW, what denomination of dhimmi is Jimmy Carter?
The fact that islamist terrorists spreading violence in Europe or the U.S. don't have "proven" or "official" ties to A.Q. is not evidence of diminished A.Q. influence. It's evidence of left wing naivete. Whatever the reach of A.Q. and even a semi-organised following of those intent on spreading sharia, it's evidence that there is no serious effort to require emigrants to accept "democratic values" (such as freedom of thought, freedom of speech, a free press, separation of church and state). The failure to respond to the "Islamists among us" is evidence that Western political elites are undermining the very basis of democratic society. One may argue as to what a true "war on terror" should encompass but failing to take appropriate action against enemies in our midst is a despicable betrayal.
Post a Comment
<< Home