Here are some more reasons why I oppose Obama and Democrats, though in truth, McCain and Republicans are not much better than Obama and the Democrats in some cases. The Democrats claim to be for individual liberty. By that they mean they are for social issues such as abortion, gay marriage, and affirmative action. They actually are opposed to freedom of speech and economic freedom. For example, they intend to re-institutute the ridiculously mis-named "fairness doctrine." They intend to put talk radio off of the air, along with, they hope, the Fox Broadcasting Network. Of course, this desire for fairness will not affect their supporters at NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, PBS, etc. They would like to limit the internet, though that may be a more difficult challenge. They also want to criminalize so-called "hate speech," which would include such things as pointing out that Islam calls on its followers to war against non-believers, something that is true. My problem with the association of Obama and the communist terrorist William Ayers has more to do with Ayers current efforts to indoctrinate children to support revelution and to detest capitalism than Ayers long ago terrorist acts. Obama worked with Ayers to achieve his goals, and says he wants to impose the indoctrination of school children throughout the nation. (It is curious to me that a communist terrorist like Ayers, who continues to advocate the destruction of America, can become a respected citizen in Chicago. That is scary to me.) The Democrats caused a lot of current finacial crisis with their insistence on forcing banks to loan money to poor people to buy homes they couldn't afford. (The greed of the Democrat's financial supporters like the unscrupulous robber barons Angelo Mozillo, Dick Fuld, and Franklin Raines were also a factor, along with the regulators who let financial entities increase their leverage to extremes.) Now Democrats are saying that they want to just give the houses to the poor people who foolishly bought a house they couldn't afford. Obama is also a believer in the unproven hypothesis that CO2 emissions cause climate change (as is John McCain.) BUt, Obama proposes that the uS implement an energy policy similar to that Great Britain adopted a few years ago, despite the now apparent failure of that policy in Great Britain. Obama wants to get rid of nuclear power, stop drilling, and build windmills and solar power plants. He says that thsi will create 5 million "green" jobs. I suppose he could cause that to happen, but even his god-like powers will not make that pay off in satisfaction of the United States energy needs. McCain at least wants to build nuclear power plants and drill for oil, as well trying to develop wind and solar power.