The Ft. Worth Star Telegram had an article recently that siad "Existing carbon dioxide enough to raise sea level." The article says that a sea level rise of 4.6 ft is a done deal; the CO2 already in the atmosphere will cause the rise, even if we shut off all industry, automobiles, etc. The article also had the ridiculous predictions of droughts, floods, species extinction, disease spread, more severe storms, etc. Most of those predictions have been denied, even by those who believe the global warming hypothesis. Here is a letter I wrote to the Star-Telegram:

The article Sunday by Arthur Max basically says the end is near; it’s too late to save mankind since the carbon dioxide already in the atmosphere is going to cause cataclysmic climate change. I’m surprised that you buried this story in the back pages. One would think it would be front page news. I hope you realize that the story is hype, and that is why you buried it, but I’m not certain.



One could reasonably be skeptical of the story, given that the source is the UN. The UN has just admitted that they lied about the extent of AIDS infection in the world in order to support AIDS research fund raising activities. And in the Max story there is a quote from UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon “The world’s scientists have spoken clearly and with one voice.” That is clearly untrue, so I think we can assume that the UN is again lying to gain support for their agenda.



Why don’t you do a story about what the UN’s agenda actually is? Some think the agenda is to damage the economy of the US. Others think it is to support establishment of a world government. Perhaps it is just to provide a means for rent-seekers to make profits. Or, maybe all of these.