I don't listen to Rush Limbaugh, so I missed the parody of KSM singing New York, New York. A friend sent it to me, and it is pretty good. I saw the lawyer for one terrorist on the O'Reilly TV show, and the lawyer said that in their trial the 9/11 terrorists would explain why they attacked the US. The lawyer wouldn't say, but I got the impression that he felt the terrorists were justified. O'Reilly didn't ask questions that I was curious about, such as, did the terrorists consider themselves to be soldiers in a war against the US, and would they seek a change of venue from New York. I think the best the terrorist can hope for is a hung jury, and they would have a better chance of finding a socialist juror in Washington, DC, for example. But, I thought a hung jury was the best OJ could hope for in his murder trial with his "I'm a victim, the police did it" defense, and look how that turned out. In another matter, I wonder if Obama has thought about the sacrifice that will be required of the jurors. The trial may well take years, and the jurors, given the way Muslims operate, there will be a threat to the jurors safety. Despite what he says, Obama clearly wants to put the US foreign policy on trial. I wonder if he has thought about the fact that the terrorists can't excuse their attack based on the subsequent actions of George Bush: the terrorists have to have acted in response to the foreign policy of Bill Clinton. I suppose that Obama may regard the trial of the terrorists as another manufactured crisis useful in his Cloward-Pivens strategy to destroy capitalism in America.